Beyond the Flock

Entries tagged as ‘sean hannity’

Deliver us from Sean II

July 3, 2008 · Leave a Comment

After some gruesome descriptions of the Holocaust, Hannity writes:

“I know this is painful to read, but the only way to come to terms with such
evil is to confront it directly. Rather than treating the Holocaust as dry
history, I believe we must pull something deeper from it, something
real
— that can make us understand evil more intimately” (35).

Trouble is, upon more careful examination, most of Hitler’s henchmen performing their gruesome tasts weren’t “evil.” They were, as many of them later professed, simply following orders, and had been bombarded with propaganda all their lives. The power of authority is amazing. Consider this 1968 interview with an American Vietnam veteran:

Q. How many people did you round up?
A. Well, there was about forty, fifty people that we gathered in the center
of the village. And we placed them there, and it was like a little island, right
there in the center of the village, I’d say, …and…
Q. What kind of people–men, women, children?
A. Men, women, children.
Q. Babies?
A. Babies. And we huddled them up. We mand them squat down and Lieutenant
Calley came over and said, “You know what to do with them, don’t you?” And I
said yes. So I took it for granted that he just wanted us to watch them. And he
left and came back about ten or fifteen minutes later and said, “How come you
ain’t killed them yet?” And I told him that I didn’t think you wanted us to kill
them, that you just wanted us to guard them. He said, “No, I want them dead.”
So–

Q. And you killed how many? At that time?
A. Well, I fired them automatic, so you can’t– You just spray the area on
them and so you can’t know how many you killed ’cause they were going fast. So I
might have killed ten or fifteen of them.
Q. Men, women, children?
A. Men, women, children.
Q. And babies?
A. And babies.

Q. Why did you do it?
A. Why did I do it? Because I felt like I was ordered to do it, and it
seemed like that, at the time I felt like I was doing the right thing, because,
like I said, I lost buddies. … after I done it, I felt good, but later on that
day, it was getting to me.
Q.You’re married?
A. Right.
Q. Children?
A. Two.

Q. …How do you shoot babies?
A. I don’t know. It’s just one of those things. (qtd. in Milgram, pp. 183)

You’ll note that when asked why he did it, he doesn’t say, “Well, I have a firm belief in my duty to spread evil.” You’d be hard-pressed to find anyone who would say that. Consider also Stanley Milgram’s famous study, showing that when given an order by a guy in a white lab coat, 65% of people will do what he says, even if it involves delivering electric shocks to an ordinary guy who can be heard screaming in pain and pleading for release. What Hannity chalks up to evil is a much more complicated psychological matter. Unfortunately, the real world isn’t in black and white.

Categories: Politics · Relevant rants
Tagged: , ,

Deliver us from Sean I

July 1, 2008 · Leave a Comment

I picked up a copy of Deliver Us from Evil at the library the other day. It’s Sean Hannity’s 2004 book, subtitled “Defeating Terrorism, Despotism, and Liberalism.” Besides being horribly repetitive, Sean’s got it all wrong. I don’t have time to write a refutation of the whole thing, and I doubt you have time to read it. However, a few notable nuggets of nonsense:

“In the story of Nazi Germany, we see what happens when man forsakes faith, morality and conscience in favor of unquestioned loyalty to the state” (30).

Hmmm. Mind, Hannity’s just spent most of the 29 pages preceding this remark telling us how right America was in its decision to invade Afghanistan and Iraq, and how purely evil terrorists are. Terrorists, though, as Hannity does his best to avoid pointing out, are motivated primarily by faith, thereby not “forsaking” it in the slightest. Morality and conscience – okay, maybe terrorists do forsake that, at least by our cultural definitions of morality and conscience. Sean deserves a smidgen of credit for not equating morality and conscience with faith. The implicit assertion that by “forsaking” faith, we’ll become Hitlers is absurd, and plainly erroneous.

As for unquestioned loyalty to the state… “More than 225 years after that Declaration [of Independence], America has become, without rival, the world’s most beneficent nation. … America sends her young men and women to war to defend the weak. She sends her resources to help feed the poor. And she offers a hand to any nation that seeks friendship and peace” (11-12).

Now, maybe I’m wrong, but that sounds a lot like unquestioned loyalty to me. Sure, maybe we “liberated” the Iraqis. Sean overlooks our callousness to other places in need of “a hand.” Darfur comes to mind; or Zimbabwe. Could it be that Sean is ignoring some other, less poetic motivator? How about, “But most importantly, she uses military force to take over places that have a lot of oil.”

Thanks for reading.

Categories: Politics · Relevant rants
Tagged: , ,